shews that (irrespectively of the question of the book being mis-described - to which Dr Eitel denied this repudiates having made the statement) is true so found he did. not consider Dr Litel's having told the story about Mr Abyster a serious offence.
As to his reply to Sir Hennessy - I agree with des Voeux that his despatch does not satisfactorily meet the circumstantial statements in Dr Petel's letter 27 Oct 927 (1) as to his responsibility for Dr Litel's slander. As I have already observed, I see no way of deciding between the conflicting statements as to the instructions given by Sir Hennessy to Dr Eitel and Dr Litel as to the line to be taken.
but even assuming that Sir Hennessy did give instructions to Dr Eitel, I do not see that he would have been justified in authorizing Dr Brunefy to state to members of the Leg Council the true facts as to the exclusion by the Government of ...
On the other hand, if Sir Hennessy had not authorized Dr Litel to repeat the story, the latter having told a false and scandalous story, his conduct is unworthy of Her Majesty's Commission.
It is therefore material to know whether the Governor did make to Dr Eitel the statements attributed to him in par 30 of Dr J; Willey's letter 27 Dec and whether these statements were true.
It is stated that the Governor in his despatch does not explicitly deny making these statements, nor does he explicitly say that Dr Eitel's statement to Mr Whason was incorrect.
"authoritative statement" reported to in par 5 and transmitted with his Confidential Despatch 2583 KRALA omits mention of the steamboat excursion or the hiding of the book and states that the book was the catalogue of the Naples Museum, not the British Museum.
I think that Sir Hennessy should be called upon to state whether or not he did make the statements attributed to him by Dr Eitel and whether they were true.
Page 19
MINUTE PAPER.
the anthem statement written statement read to Dr de Voeux contains the whole of the facts and whether the action taken was real in that written statement.
...
Page 327
8
...
',
shews that (irrespectivly of the question of the book
being
болу
mis-described
a1
to which die Money
that Eitil denied this repudiates having made the statement) is trans
so found he did. not consider D. litel's having and the tild infchusen the story about Ms Abyster
M. Mar a serious
Mence
As to his pher Hennesy -
I aper
with des Soden that his despatit
my does not satisfactorily meet the Circumstantial statements in Dr Peteli letter 27 Det 927
(1) as
to his responsibility for Dt liteli slander_ As I Leen already dieved I see no way of deciding hlinen the
of the live
hlien the conflicting statements as 4 the instructions price &
die / Hinnesy 15 Dr Eitil
8. Siteli 4h the live version
but even
aframing
I do not se
would have femme for authorizing thas Sie I Brunefy was to Name for
hes Prich Scereting to explain to members y the Ley Council the live facts
as to the exclusin
I her Hayter pom govemment do да
so have precies was what
bean he stays wish to munding t helloy the quail just before testing p. Pakar cherpe the
pah hiding
On the other hand win
Sis I Hennesy had
not autherived Athlet & repeat the story, of
:he litd. D: Eitel a pole & scandeleus stery
his conduct is unwertly Her Majes&i Ammission
a pullemar. butting
- it is therefpe I Reik
g
MINUTE PAPER.
material to know whether the Groomer
19
did make to for fitil the statements attributed.
totein in par 30 g DJ; Willey 27 De
Lo
and whether these statements wore time.
thed that the Governor in his despatch
there statements respect
does not explicitly ding making por does he explicitly say fast Dr. Vitel's statement to Mr Whason was
Morschuson was inconect
"authoritativ
but the statement" reporred to in for 5 and hansmitted with his Confidential Despatch
2583 KRALA
omilo
arez
mention
the steamboat.
Excursion or the hiding of the book and states that the book was the catalogue of the
but, hot, If the Pruster Museum-
Naples Rolling Museum
and also affipes
hi
I think that by JWmnesty should he called
ĥ
Jaz
whither wote he did or did
upen but batt. De hitel that to fear and had this the book and that he renke the statements &D. Vitit set pitt
Shein and whether the liller & 27 Sw= is par 30
327
8
the anthemstation written statement read
them & derpharon Cutamis the whole of the facts
and whether
M
the action
antes real in that wonten stelivat ant
which writ
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.